National policy



National policy

Valerie 0 30 02.09 11:03
As mentioned earlier, the development of science and technology in the United States has both government factors and non-governmental elements. More importantly, in the state system of the United States, the government is only an enterprise elected by all citizens to manage the state and society, so the government can not violate the law, let alone trample on other enterprises. In fact, the federal government of the United States has not had much authority on domestic issues. Take the financial system for example, as early as the end of the 19th century, American financiers represented by Morgan forced the federal government to hand over the right of coinage through the economic crisis, and achieved the glorious history of American investment banks. Since then, several US presidents have attempted to take back the right to coin, that is, to nationalize the Federal Reserve Bank and issue and guarantee US dollars by the federal government, but almost all of these US presidents have come to no good end. The typical examples are Kennedy and Clinton, one of whom was assassinated and the other was notorious. In the key technologies related to the fundamental interests of the country, especially the fundamental interests of many large enterprises, it is American enterprises, especially the interest groups with enterprise background, rather than the federal government, that really play a leading role. In this way, even if the Secretary of State of the United States makes more guarantees in Paris, even if these guarantees are affirmed by legislation, as long as they are ultimately contrary to the interests of the United States, or if they are lost without harming the interests of the Uni Ted States,push back racking system, American enterprises can withdraw their promises by re-legislating or repealing legislation. It is not that the United States has not done so, but that it has often done so. For example, before the Gulf War in the 1990s, the United States promised that all allies who sent troops would have the opportunity to share in the benefits of defeating Iraq and helping Kuwait recover, which was also the main motivation for other countries to send troops. But in the end, in order not to let other countries share the results of the war, the United States did not overthrow Saddam's regime at one go, but waited for more than a decade before sending Saddam to the gallows in the second war, and none of the many European countries that contributed money and effort to send troops during the Gulf War was able to reap the benefits. As the saying goes, if you suffer a loss, you will gain wisdom. It is not that France has not suffered a loss, but that it has suffered many times. Any politician with a normal IQ should know that the United States can't count its guarantees, heavy duty rack manufacturers ,wire mesh decking, and that the United States is the best country in the world at playing tricks. The problem is that the French President attaches great importance to the proposal of the Secretary of State of the United States and expresses his intention to cooperate. In fact, this is the key. As an intelligence agency, the Military Intelligence Agency will never mention any subjective opinions in the intelligence reports submitted to government officials, especially senior officials. Even if at some point, officials like Pei Chengyi, who are related to the Military Intelligence Agency, will ask the Agency to put forward suggestions or opinions in the intelligence reports, Liu Xiaobin will be very careful and will never put forward them too sharply. And obviously biased advice. It can be said that Liu Xiaobin and Li Cunxun are exactly the same in maintaining objectivity and impartiality. In this way, Liu Xiaobin was very careful in the wording of the report, for example, when referring to the French President's reply to the US Secretary of State's proposal, he used the ambiguous word "interested". Although there is an attribute in front of it, the word itself indicates that the French president did not take the advice of the American Secretary of State. To be precise, the French president did not intend to take the advice of the US Secretary of State. There is no doubt that the French president's idea is very direct, that is, to use the United States to balance the Republic, to force the head of the Republic to make greater guarantees in Paris, and to come up with something substantive, not just a word. In other words, before that, France has no choice, whether to provide technology or not is a matter for the Republic and the United States to decide. Because the Republic and the United States have always regarded the European Union as a long-term threat, they have adopted a very consistent attitude on technology export. It can even be said that the Republic and the United States actively promote comprehensive nuclear disarmament and put pressure on almost all countries to make the London Treaty a binding international disarmament treaty, which has a lot to do with the suppression of the European Union.
You know, with the entry into force of the treaty, as the only nuclear power in the EU, France's international status will plummet, and it will be even less able to unite other EU member States, so it will not be able to integrate the EU. With the Republic sending a signal to break the deadlock, France has finally been given the option. Even if this is only an illusion, because the French authorities can not pin their hopes on the United States, the French government will use the influence of the United States to gain greater benefits. In fact, even if the United States is willing and able to provide France with advanced technology, the French authorities have to consider whether it is necessary to import these advanced technology from the United States. Still take the crucial composite batteries for example, even if the United States is willing to sell the production process of 12-level composite batteries to France and help French enterprises master it, the Republic can also make the huge investment of French enterprises wasted by introducing 16-level composite batteries in advance. You know, just 20 years ago, when the scale of the Great Depression reached its peak, the Republic quickly occupied the high-end electric industry by putting 8-stage composite batteries into the international market ahead of schedule,warehousing storage solutions, and became a high-end industrial country at one stroke, and has maintained this advantage until now. On the other hand, the French authorities have to worry about the ulterior motives of the United States.


Facebook Twitter GooglePlus KakaoStory NaverBand